Ireland Tops U.S. as the Country Best Able to Feed Its People

The U.S. for the first time dropped from the top spot in a global ranking of how well countries can feed their own people, as concerns about agricultural research spending and government policy trends may make the world’s top food exporter a less-certain place to get a meal.

Ireland is the world’s most “food-secure” nation, improving its food affordability, availability, quality and safety while the U.S. has stagnated, according to a copy of the sixth annual Global Food Security Index compiled by the Economist Intelligence Unit scheduled for release Tuesday - writesbloomberg.com.

Worldwide, food security fell for the first time in five years, largely because of increases in the number of refugees, weather disasters and a decline in global political stability. The examination, commissioned by Dupont Co., this year added metrics based on climate and natural-resource risks. Adjusting for those factors, the U.S. fell to fourth place, with Austria and France moving ahead.

Top 20 Countries Before and After New Metrics

U.S., already down a notch, falls to fourth when climate's factored in

“Food security is in reverse,”said Robert Powell, a senior consultant with the Economist Intelligence Unit in New York. “If we’re aiming for zero hunger, we’re going in the wrong direction.”

The number of people suffering from hunger rose by about 38 million to 815 million in 2016, the United Nations said last month. Climate change is seen as a driver of increasing weather volatility which is contributing to famines in developing nations. This year, adverse weather combined with conflict was tied to famine and severe food shortages in South Sudan, Nigeria, Somalia and Yemen.

Richer nations have fewer problems providing inexpensive, plentiful and safe food to their citizens. Still, risks remain, and some are increasing, according to the study.

Read also other analytics news of Dublin on our site.

Four Categories Make Up the Score

Natural resources and resilience were added this year

Wealthier countries including the U.S. and Canada have highly productive food systems, but use more water than they need to, leaving them more vulnerable to increasingly severe droughts expected because of climate change. European nations, meanwhile, may see strains caused by an aging population that pays less in taxes and demands more social services.

Countries in sub-Saharan Africa clustered near the bottom of the rankings yet have opportunities to develop more sustainable food systems as late adapters to technology, the report said.

Meanwhile, some developed nations rose or fell dramatically in the rankings because of local circumstances. Austria has a relatively stable climate and very low soil erosion, aiding food production, sending its rating upward. Singapore, meanwhile, fell more than any other nation, given the threat it faces from rising sea levels, exposure to extreme weather and reliance on food imports.

Climate and Resources: Nobody's Perfect

Singapore threat severe while every country faces challenges

The study places a high value on government support for agricultural research, which is important to keeping nutrition inexpensive and available as food needs increase, Powell said. This is where Ireland, a country where an 1840s famine led a half-million residents to migrate to America, has excelled while the U.S. has faltered, according to the report.

Ireland has outspent the U.S. in relative terms on public research and development on agriculture over the past five years, increasing farming’s share of gross domestic product even as its economy has grown, according to data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development.

U.S. funding as a share of GDP has declined over that same period. That, combined with concerns about U.S. governance—“the United States’ hostile policy towards immigration and trade has dampened the foreign policy outlook” the report said—allowed Ireland to take the top spot.

“Ireland has roared back marvelously from the banking crisis, and their agriculture research and development has increased,” Powell said. In the U.S., “we haven’t seen that level of public-sector investment.”

The study, first published in 2012, is used to guide corporate decisions on allocating resources, said Krysta Harden, a former U.S. Agriculture Department deputy secretary who’s now the chief sustainability officer and vice president for public policy for the agriculture division of DowDuPont Inc.

Its publication is meant to aid governments, nongovernmental organizations and businesses in understanding where food struggles are greatest and where more work needs to be done even in relatively more secure nations, she said.

“Hopefully it’s a wake-up call,” she said. “Agriculture is an ongoing investment that cannot end and cannot be diminished.”

The Global Index

Sort by Overall Score, Resources and Resilience, and Adjusted Score

Ireland
85.6
73.4
79.9
−5.7
Austria
81.6
80.3
77.6
−4.0
France
82.3
76.5
77.5
−4.8
United States
84.6
65.8
77.4
−7.2
Germany
82.5
74.9
77.3
−5.2
Switzerland
81.6
79.0
77.3
−4.3
United Kingdom
84.2
67.0
77.3
−6.9
Canada
82.2
74.0
76.9
−5.3
Denmark
80.3
82.1
76.7
−3.6
Sweden
81.7
74.8
76.6
−5.1
Netherlands
82.8
68.6
76.3
−6.5
New Zealand
81.0
72.3
75.4
−5.6
Finland
81.0
71.5
75.2
−5.8
Australia
83.3
60.1
75.0
−8.3
Norway
81.4
66.6
74.6
−6.8
Belgium
79.8
69.5
73.7
−6.1
Japan
79.5
70.4
73.6
−5.9
Portugal
79.0
71.6
73.4
−5.6
Singapore
84.0
49.2
73.3
−10.7
Spain
78.1
72.5
72.7
−5.4
Czech Republic
75.8
80.3
72.1
−3.7
Italy
75.9
72.9
70.8
−5.1
Poland
74.1
78.8
70.2
−3.9
Israel
79.2
51.3
69.6
−9.6
Hungary
72.2
79.0
68.4
−3.8
Chile
74.7
62.6
67.7
−7.0
Greece
71.9
74.4
67.3
−4.6
Slovakia
70.0
81.1
66.7
−3.3
South Korea
74.7
53.9
66.1
−8.6
Kuwait
74.6
51.1
65.5
−9.1
Uruguay
69.7
75.9
65.5
−4.2
Oman
73.9
49.2
64.5
−9.4
Qatar
73.3
49.9
64.1
−9.2
Romania
67.7
75.2
63.5
−4.2
Costa Rica
69.3
58.5
62.1
−7.2
Saudi Arabia
71.0
46.3
61.5
−9.5
Russia
66.2
71.0
61.4
−4.8
Argentina
67.3
64.2
61.3
−6.0
Brazil
67.7
60.6
61.0
−6.7
Bahrain
68.6
53.0
60.5
−8.1
United Arab Emirates
70.9
40.0
60.3
−10.6
Bulgaria
62.9
75.1
59.0
−3.9
Malaysia
66.2
52.1
58.3
−7.9
Mexico
65.8
54.4
58.3
−7.5
China
63.7
60.1
57.3
−6.4
South Africa
64.0
57.7
57.2
−6.8
Belarus
63.0
62.6
57.1
−5.9
Turkey
61.1
67.0
56.1
−5.0
Serbia
60.6
69.0
55.9
−4.7
Panama
62.5
54.1
55.3
−7.2
Botswana
59.4
62.6
53.8
−5.6
Colombia
60.1
53.8
53.2
−6.9
Thailand
58.3
64.3
53.1
−5.2
Jordan
58.3
62.8
52.9
−5.4
Tunisia
58.8
56.6
52.4
−6.4
Azerbaijan
57.8
59.8
52.0
−5.8
Paraguay
56.5
66.7
51.8
−4.7
Kazakhstan
56.0
67.7
51.5
−4.5
Peru
59.2
45.4
51.1
−8.1
Egypt
56.6
57.0
50.5
−6.1
Ecuador
55.2
52.4
48.6
−6.6
Dominican Republic
54.8
53.6
48.4
−6.4
Ukraine
54.1
58.2
48.4
−5.7
Vietnam
54.0
58.1
48.3
−5.7
El Salvador
53.1
58.4
47.6
−5.5
Sri Lanka
53.0
58.4
47.5
−5.5
Morocco
52.8
55.1
46.9
−5.9
Bolivia
51.3
62.1
46.4
−4.9
Algeria
51.5
53.5
45.5
−6.0
Venezuela
50.2
60.6
45.3
−4.9
Nicaragua
50.0
61.8
45.2
−4.8
Guatemala
49.6
61.8
44.9
−4.7
Indonesia
51.3
46.5
44.4
−6.9
Honduras
48.6
62.7
44.1
−4.5
Pakistan
47.8
62.5
43.3
−4.5
India
48.9
53.7
43.2
−5.7
Ghana
47.9
57.4
42.8
−5.1
Uzbekistan
47.5
54.7
42.1
−5.4
Philippines
47.3
52.0
41.6
−5.7
Myanmar
44.8
69.5
41.4
−3.4
Uganda
43.3
71.3
40.2
−3.1
Senegal
44.2
61.8
40.0
−4.2
Nepal
44.5
58.5
39.9
−4.6
Cambodia
43.3
63.1
39.3
−4.0
Cote d’Ivoire
42.5
69.9
39.3
−3.2
Kenya
42.2
63.7
38.4
−3.8
Cameroon
41.6
57.3
37.2
−4.4
Rwanda
39.8
68.4
36.7
−3.1
Mali
39.4
63.8
35.8
−3.6
Bangladesh
39.7
56.2
35.4
−4.3
Benin
39.6
56.5
35.3
−4.3
Nigeria
38.4
60.7
34.6
−3.8
Togo
37.2
60.5
33.5
−3.7
Tanzania
35.4
67.5
32.5
−2.9
Tajikistan
35.9
53.7
31.7
−4.2
Sudan
34.8
57.0
31.1
−3.7
Burkina Faso
33.1
69.5
30.6
−2.5
Laos
33.1
68.7
30.5
−2.6
Guinea
34.0
56.0
30.3
−3.7
Ethiopia
33.3
61.1
30.1
−3.2
Mozambique
33.7
54.3
29.8
−3.9
Zambia
32.4
67.3
29.8
−2.6
Angola
33.2
56.8
29.6
−3.6
Syria
33.3
50.7
29.2
−4.1
Malawi
31.3
70.1
29.0
−2.3
Niger
29.5
67.0
27.1
−2.4
Haiti
29.1
60.4
26.2
−2.9
Sierra Leone
28.7
57.5
25.7
−3.0
Chad
28.3
59.0
25.4
−2.9
Yemen
28.8
47.5
25.0
−3.8
Madagascar
27.2
66.2
24.9
−2.3
Burundi
25.1
68.8
23.1
−2.0
Congo (Dem. Rep.)
25.5
46.3
22.1
−3.4

Feedbacks and comments

Write feedback
Write comment

Please leave a constructive, reasoned and informative text relating to the quality of the company's work, on the example of personal experience.

Not allowed: use of non-normative obscenities, threats or insults; direct comparison with other competing companies; placing a links to third-party Internet resources; advertising and self-promotion, statements related to the company's activities.

Enter e-mail:
Your e-mail will not be shown on the site
or Log in , for write feedback
Feedback:
Load photo:
Select

Comments are designed to communicate and discuss the features of an enterprise or event, as well as to find out the interesting questions on it.